ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE - no client site, credentials, personal data, or production result is represented here.
Atharv Mantri / paid diagnosisBack to portfolio

A decision-ready 45-minute review

Find the sharpest friction first.

A paid diagnosis is a bounded investigation of one reproducible bug, UI issue, or QA concern. The output is a written finding, evidence, and a next-step recommendation - not an unlimited promise to fix everything.

Illustrative report / mobile booking flow

One clear finding. Three useful next steps.

Sample brief: review one mobile booking page where visitors report dropping before sending an enquiry. The review checks the stated flow, one mobile viewport, and the agreed acceptance question.

Finding: the request is too generic to qualify.

The page asks for a free-form message but does not capture service, preferred date, or approximate budget. A visitor can submit, but the team cannot quickly decide what to answer.

Evidence and handoff

  • Reproduction path: landing page - contact action - generic message field
  • Impact: extra back-and-forth before a useful reply
  • Confidence: high within the agreed page and viewport
  • Recommended next step: add three qualifying prompts and keep one obvious CTA
  • Out of scope: implementation, analytics claims, and unrelated pages

What you send

One reproducible bug, UI concern, page, repository, or bounded QA question with the expected check.

What you receive

A concise written finding, reproduction/checklist, confidence level, limitation, and recommended next action.

What stays protected

No production credentials or client data before an authorized written engagement. No unpaid trial.

Indicative paid entry

Up to 45 minutes. INR 750-1,500 indicative.

Written scope, acceptance check, payout terms, and guardian consent are agreed before work begins because Atharv is 15.

  • One issue, page, or bounded QA concern
  • One agreed environment or viewport
  • Written diagnosis and next-step note
  • No unlimited fix or open-ended audit